Hidden Planet

The Huffington Post                                                                                                                http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/14/tyche-hidden-planet_n_823028.html

By: Dean Praetorius  First Posted: 02/14/11 03:13 PM ET

Tyche, Giant Hidden Planet, May Exist In Our Solar System

We may have lost Pluto, but it looks like we might be getting Tyche.

Scientists may soon be able to prove the existence of the gas giant, which could be four times the size of Jupiter, according to astrophysicists John Matese and Daniel Whitmire from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. The two first proposed Tyche’s existence in order to explain a change in path of comets entering the solar system, according to The Independent.

From the The Independent:

Tyche will almost certainly be made up mostly of hydrogen and helium and will probably have an atmosphere much like Jupiter’s, with colourful spots and bands and clouds, Professor Whitmire said. “You’d also expect it to have moons. All the outer planets have them,” he added.

For a graphical representation of Tyche, click here.

So how could we have missed such a massive planet in our own solar system?

Well, it’s 15,000 times further from the sun than Earth, according to Gizmodo. Tyche (if it does exist) lies in the Oort cloud, the outer shell of asteroids in our solar system.

Despite what the scientists believe they will find in the data (which will be released in April and was collected by NASA Wise space telescope), there is at least one flaw in their theory. Theoretically, a planet of Tyche’s size should seriously disturb comets in the inner Oort Cloud, but that effect is yet to have been observed, according to The Independent.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Science, Space and NASA

Orange County’s water gets fluoride

The Orange County Register                                                                                       November 16, 2007

By ADAM TOWNSEND

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California on Monday will start pumping fluoride into Orange County’s water supply.

MWD Spokesman Bob Muir said the fluoride injection system at the Robert B. Diemer Filtration plant in Yorba Linda is ready. Diemer supplies about half of the drinking water in Orange County.

Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach have been the only communities in the county with fluoridated water.

The Diemer plant is the second-to-last MWD plant to go online with the chemical, advocated by dentists and doctors who say it promotes healthy teeth.

Muir acknowledged the concerns of some national groups and community members who say fluoride is actually harmful to health, but he pointed out that it was a consortium of dentists and medical doctors who approached the MWD board and asked it to fluoridate Southern California’s water supply in the first place.

“There are pockets of the community that have questions and concerns about fluoridation,” he said. “This is being done at the request of dentists and doctors throughout the region.”

Muir says he often has to deal with angry customers complaining about fluoridation. Many county residents, however, aren’t worried.

“I would assume if it’s being done, it’s being done to improve the quality of our teeth,” said Joe Carey, 46, of Rancho Santa Margarita. “If it ultimately does that, I don’t have a problem with it.”

“I’m definitely for it,” said Bill Mitchell, 83, of Placentia. “I think it’s a great preventative and I don’t have any problem with it.”

Who gets fluoride?

When the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California starts adding fluoride to its water in November, some of Orange County’s 3.2 million users will get fully fluoridated water. Others will get none and still others will get a mix of fluoridated and nonfluoridated water. Below is a breakdown of where the water goes, listed by water provider.

All customers will get fully fluoridated water:

El Toro Water District

Emerald Bay Service District

Laguna Beach CWE

Moulton Niguel Water District

South Coast Water District

Santa Margarita Water District

Some customers will get fully fluoridated water:

City of Anaheim

City of Brea

City of Buena Park

East Orange County Water District

City of Fullerton

City of Garden Grove

Golden State Water Company

Irvine Ranch Water District

City of La Habra

City of La Palma

MesaConsolidated

City of Newport Beach

City of Orange

OrangeParkAcres Mutual

San Clemente

San Juan Capistrano

City of Santa Ana

City of Seal Beach

Serrano Water District

Trabuco Canyon Water District

City of Tustin

City of Westminster

Yorba Linda Water District

All customers already get fully fluoridated water:

City of Fountain Valley

City of Huntington Beach

The remaining six largest cities are not fluoridated: Fresno, CA, San

Jose, CA, Colorado Springs, CO, Honolulu, HI, Wichita, KS and Portland, OR.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Politics, Science, Society

NEANDERTHAL GENETICS

http://news.discovery.com/human/genetics-neanderthal-110718.html

Analysis by Jennifer Viegas
Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:25 AM ET

If your heritage is non-African, you are part Neanderthal, according to a new study in the July issue ofMolecular Biology and Evolution. Discovery News has been reporting on human/Neanderthal interbreeding for some time now, so this latest research confirms earlier findings.

Damian Labuda of the University of Montreal’s Department of Pediatrics and the CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center conducted the study with his colleagues. They determined some of the human X chromosome originates from Neanderthals, but only in people of non-African heritage.

“This confirms recent findings suggesting that the two populations interbred,” Labuda was quoted as saying in a press release. His team believes most, if not all, of the interbreeding took place in the Middle East, while modern humans were migrating out of Africa and spreading to other regions.

The ancestors of Neanderthals left Africa about 400,000 to 800,000 years ago. They evolved over the millennia mostly in what are now France, Spain, Germany and Russia. They went extinct, or were simply absorbed into the modern human population, about 30,000 years ago.

Neanderthals possessed the gene for language and had sophisticated music, art and tool craftsmanship skills, so they must have not been all that unattractive to modern humans at the time.

“In addition, because our methods were totally independent of Neanderthal material, we can also conclude that previous results were not influenced by contaminating artifacts,” Labuda said.

This work goes back to nearly a decade ago, when Labuda and his colleagues identified a piece of DNA, called a haplotype, in the human X chromosome that seemed different. They questioned its origins.

Fast forward to 2010, when the Neanderthal genome was sequenced. The researchers could then compare the haplotype to the Neanderthal genome as well as to the DNA of existing humans. The scientists found that the sequence was present in people across all continents, except for sub-Saharan Africa, and including Australia.

“There is little doubt that this haplotype is present because of mating with our ancestors and Neanderthals,” said Nick Patterson of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University. Patterson did not participate in the latest research. He added, “This is a very nice result, and further analysis may help determine more details.”

David Reich, a Harvard Medical School geneticist, added, “Dr. Labuda and his colleagues were the first to identify a genetic variation in non-Africans that was likely to have come from an archaic population. This was done entirely without the Neanderthal genome sequence, but in light of the Neanderthal sequence, it is now clear that they were absolutely right!”

The modern human/Neanderthal combo likely benefitted our species, enabling it to survive in harsh, cold regions that Neanderthals previously had adapted to.

“Variability is very important for long-term survival of a species,” Labuda concluded. “Every addition to the genome can be enriching.”

Leave a Comment

Filed under Science

NEANDERTHALS, HUMANS INTERBRED, DNA PROVES

THE GIST
  • A newly mapped Neanderthal genome provides strong evidence that humans and Neanderthals interbred.
  • Between 1-4 percent of the DNA of many humans living today likely came from Neanderthals.
  • People of European and Asian heritage are most likely to carry the Neanderthal genes.

It’s official: Most of us are part Neanderthal. The first draft sequence of the Neanderthal genome has provided the strongest evidence yet that modern humans and Neanderthals interbred and that all non-Africans today have Neanderthal gene fragments in their genetic codes.

Although the Neanderthal contribution to the DNA of these individuals is estimated at being just one to four percent of the total, the finding, published in the latest issue of the journal Science, helps to resolve the long-standing controversy over whether or not humans mated with Neanderthals when the two groups encountered each other outside of Africa.

It also gives new life to Neanderthals that, as a species, went extinct 30,000 years ago.

“Neanderthals live on in non-Africans,” co-author David Reich told Discovery News. “At least some Neanderthals were absorbed into the modern human population.”

Reich is an associate professor of genetics at Harvard University who also serves as a population geneticist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.

He and his colleagues analyzed over one billion DNA fragments taken from Neanderthal bones — dating to approximately 38,000 years ago — found in Croatia, Germany, Russia and Spain.

Although 95 percent of the fragments consisted of bacteria and microorganisms that colonized the Neanderthal remains, special DNA isolation and anti-contamination measures enabled the scientists to piece together over 60 percent of the entire Neanderthal genome.

By Jennifer Viegas

Leave a Comment

Filed under Science

Popcorn Brian

http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/06/23/tech.popcorn.brain.ep/index.html

(CNN) — When Hilarie Cash arrives home from work in the evening, she has a choice: She can go outside and tend to her garden or she can hop on her laptop.

The lilacs really need weeding. The computer, on the other hand, can wait, as her work is done for the day.

Despite this, Cash feels drawn to the computer, as if it’s a magnet pulling her in. Maybe there’s an e-mail from a friend awaiting her, or a funny tweet, or a new picture posted on Facebook.

“I find it extremely difficult to walk away,” Cash says. “It’s so hard to tell myself, ‘Don’t do it. Go do the gardening.’ ”

Does it really matter if Cash gardens or goes online? Increasing, experts say it does. The worry is that life online is giving us what researcher, David Levy, calls “popcorn brain” — a brain so accustomed to the constant stimulation of electronic multitasking that we’re unfit for life offline, where things pop at a much slower pace.

Preferring a smartphone to a child

Levy, a professor with the Information School at the University of Washington, tells the story of giving a speech at a high-tech company. Afterward at lunch, an employee sheepishly told him how the night before his wife had asked him to give their young daughter a bath. Instead of enjoying the time with his child, he spent the time on his phone, texting and returning e-mails. He didn’t have to work, it was just that the urge to use the phone was more irresistible than the child in the tub.

“It’s really ubiquitous,” says Cash, a counselor who treats people who have trouble giving up their gadgets. “We can’t just sit quietly and wait for a bus, and that’s too bad, because our brains need that down time to rest, to process things.”

Clifford Nass, a social psychologist at Stanford, says studies show multitasking on the Internet can make you forget how to read human emotions. When he showed online multitaskers pictures of faces, they had a hard time identifying the emotions they were showing.

When he read stories to the multitaskers, they had difficulty identifying the emotions of the people in the stories, and saying what they would do to make the person feel better.

“Human interaction is a learned skill, and they don’t get to practice it enough,” he says.

This is your brain on technology

The human brain is wired to crave the instant gratification, fast pace, and unpredictability of technology, Cash says.

“I never know what the next tweet is going to be. Who’s sent me an e-mail? What will I find with the next click of the mouse? What’s waiting for me?” says Cash, who practices in Redmond, Washington. “But I know what’s waiting for me in my garden.”

Dr. Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, admits she, too, has a hard time resisting the call of her BlackBerry. “On vacation, I look at it even though I don’t need to,” she says. “Or I take a walk with my husband and I can’t resist the urge to check my e-mail. I feel guilty, but I do it.”

She explains that constant stimulation can activate dopamine cells in the nucleus accumbens, a main pleasure center of the brain.

Over time, and with enough Internet usage, the structure of our brains can actually physically change, according to a new study. Researchers in China did MRIs on the brains of 18 college students who spent about 10 hours a day online.

Compared with a control group who spent less than two hours a day online, these students had less gray matter, the thinking part of the brain. The study was published in the June issue of PLoS ONE, an online journal.

How to cope with popcorn brain

Some people can easily switch from the constant popping of online life to the slower pace of the real world. If you’re not one of those people and the slow pace makes you jittery, here are some tips:

1. Keep a record of your online life

Keep track of how much time you spend online, and what you’re doing with it, Levy suggests. Note how you feel before and during your time at the computer.

“Everyone I’ve told to do this has come back with personal realizations,” he says. “Very commonly, people will say they tend to go online when they’re feeling anxious or bored.”

2. Set time limits for your Internet use

Give yourself a specific time period — say two hours — to answer personal e-mails, update your Facebook page, and check texts, Cash suggests. After that, it’s time to turn the computer (or phone) off and do something offline.

3. Stare out the window

Take two minutes to stare out the window. Levy says this can help train your brain to slow down a bit.

4. Establish “free times”

In a blog on Psychology Today, psychologist Robert Leahy recommends experimenting with BlackBerry-free times. “For example, “I won’t check my messages between 6 and 9 p.m.,” he writes. Leahy, director of the American Institute for Cognitive Therapy, also recommends rewarding yourself for every hour that you don’t check. “Tell yourself that you are reclaiming your life,” he writes.

5. Phone a friend

Bloggers on WikiHow have been sharing their own list of tips on how to wean themselves off of everything from Internet searching to texting. One person suggests phoning a friend instead of sending instant messages. “Call a friend and ask them to go outside for at least 3 hours a day,” they write. “This will distract you from the computer.”

6. Get tested

According to the Center for Internet and Technology Addiction, you may have a problem if loved ones are becoming troubled with the amount of time you are devoting to the Internet or if you experience guilt or shame. They offer a virtual Internet addiction test that can help you determine whether it might be time to shut down, logoff or change your IM status to “away.”

CNN’s Sabriya Rice contributed to this report.

Comments Off

Filed under Society